The report gathered revealed that Professor
Yemi Osinbajo who is standing in for his principal - President
Muhammadu Buhari faces an uphill task of maintaining the unity of
Nigeria in the face of strong threats.
Yemi Osinbajo
Current report revealed that the Nigeria Acting President Yemi Osinbajo has been trying to quell the tension
arising from the quit notice by some N`orthern youths over separatist
agitations in the South-East, but analysts demand more than meetings
from the government, writes Gbenro Adeoye of the Punch.
The events of the Nigerian Civil War, also known as the Biafran
War, remain etched in the minds of all those who witnessed them. It was
fought between the government of Nigeria and the secessionist state of
Biafra, an area dominated by Igbo.
In the three-year period that the war lasted, there were an
estimated 100,000 military casualties and about three million civilians,
many of whom had died of hunger and diseases.
But since the war, the country has arguably not
been as polarised along regional and ethnic lines as it is now and the current situation makes governing the nation tougher for the Federal Government. More succinctly, the Acting President Yemi Osinbajo is in for a rough ride as he pilots the country’s affairs in the absence of his boss, President Muhammadu Buhari, who is currently on medical trip to London, the United Kingdom.
been as polarised along regional and ethnic lines as it is now and the current situation makes governing the nation tougher for the Federal Government. More succinctly, the Acting President Yemi Osinbajo is in for a rough ride as he pilots the country’s affairs in the absence of his boss, President Muhammadu Buhari, who is currently on medical trip to London, the United Kingdom.
Although, some remnants of any bitterness left over from the war
might have survived through the years, some experts believe that they
shot to the fore after former President Goodluck Jonathan lost the 2015
presidential election that would have returned him to power.
Jonathan, who is from a minority group in South-South Nigeria, was
believed to have identified a lot with the Igbo. And the administration
of President Muhammadu Buhari appeared to have ignited the flame when in
July 2015, two months after assuming office, the President said he
would treat people who voted for him differently from those who didn’t.
The Igbo’s South-East region along with the South-South, where
Jonathan hails from, had given Buhari the least number of votes. The
agitations for the state of Biafra were further heightened by the Leader
of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, who had resumed the
demand for the secession of Igbo and the entire South-East from Nigeria
before his arrest in October 2015.
And his release on bail 18 months later failed to stop agitations
for Biafra. However, the recent quit notice given by some Northern
youths to Igbo to vacate the region by October 1 and return home to
actualise their Biafran dream appears to have put the nation on the edge
of an ethnic crisis, the like of which had once led to a war.
In the last two weeks, Osinbajo has met with the country’s 36 state
governors and leaders and traditional rulers from the North and the
South-East regions, warning of dire consequences for anyone who makes
hate speeches capable of disrupting the peace of the country.
During his meeting with South-East traditional rulers, Osinbajo described Nigeria as “indivisible and indissoluble.”
He said, “As you are aware, there has been agitation from some
of our youths in the South-East, urging secession, and the creation of
Biafra.
“In apparent response, young people in the Northern states,
under the aegis of Arewa Youths, have purportedly issued an ultimatum
where they have set a date for the eviction of persons from the
South-East region that live in the Northern states.
“Those agitations, the manner of those agitations, the method
and objective are wrong, unlawful and the violation of the laws of
Nigeria and the constitution of Nigeria.
“I want to repeat that both the agitations for secession and
the ultimatum to leave the Northern states are wrong and a violation of
our constitution.
“Our constitution says in Section 2 that Nigeria is one
indivisible and indissoluble sovereign state to be known by the name the
Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“That is the law of our country. Let us not be in any doubt
about the fact that the Federal Government is committed to ensuring that
our country remains united.”
The Presidency has been praised by the public for the initiative,
which they described as necessary to douse tensions. However, according
to some political analysts, who also commended Osinbajo for consulting
with stakeholders in the North and the South-East regions, beyond
meetings, the situation requires actions.
They identified poverty, perceived marginalisation and inequality
as some of the factors contributing to the frustrations among Nigerians
and urged the current administration to have the courage to address such
concerns.
For instance, a political analyst, Mr. Gbolahan Ogundeji, said the
government must always try to accommodate the concerns of the various
groups in the country with a view to addressing their concerns where it
can.
“There are serious issues in the country; the various ethnic
groups in the country have deep mistrusts for one another. So government
should treat problems rather than the symptoms.
“The Southerners complain that federal appointments have been
lopsided and have favoured the North; some people in the North believe
it is their votes that largely contributed to Buhari’s victory at the
poll, even though, if he had not won in the South-West, he would not
have become President. There are so many issues, but we shouldn’t be too
proud to sit down together and hear one another out, so that we will
know how to move forward and live together peacefully,” he said.
Indeed, according to a Saturday PUNCH report of July 2, 2016; some
Southern groups had described Buhari’s appointments of heads of the
various security agencies in the country as “lopsided”, saying the
pattern failed to reflect federal character.
Findings by the Saturday PUNCH had shown that 14 out of the
nation’s 17 security agencies were being headed by Northerners, leaving
three for the South.
For example, it was reported that the Minister of Interior,
Lt.-Gen. Abdulrahman Dambazau (retd.), under whose purview are the
Prisons Service, Immigration Service, Fire Service and the Nigeria
Security and Civil Defence Corps, hails from Kaduna State.
The Chief of Army Staff, Lt.-Gen. Tukur Yusuf Buratai, is from
Borno State. The National Security Adviser, Maj-Gen. Babagana Monguno
(retd.), is also from Borno State. Also from Borno State is the Acting
Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mr. Ibrahim
Magu.
The Minister of Defence, Brig.-Gen. Mansur Dan Ali (retd.), hails
from Zamfara State, while the Chief of Air Staff, Air Marshal Sadique
Abubakar, is from Bauchi State. The acting Inspector-General of Police,
Ibrahim Idris, hails from Niger State, among others.
In addition, some sections of the country are also angry with the
Federal Government and the police for allegedly not doing enough to curb
the activities of suspected Fulani herdsmen across the country. The
alleged killings and destruction of farmlands by men suspected to be
Fulani herders have left so many families in deep sorrow and anguish,
and some members of other ethnic groups have asked the government to do
more in checking such activities.
There have also been calls for the implementation of the
recommendations of the 2014 National Conference report, which the
Buhari-led administration had described as meant for the archives. Some
Nigerians are also calling for restructuring, while some are asking the
government to commence moves to include referendum clause in our
constitution so that Nigerians can have the right to vote on contending
issues.
Also during the week, a South-South group, Pan Niger Delta Youth
Leadership Forum, announced that youths in the region had rejected the
N35.31bn allocation for capital projects in the zone as contained in the
2017 budget.
Its national president, Famous Daunemigha, described the amount as
insignificant compared to what other geo-political zones of the country
got. He also described the funds allocated for capital projects in the
region as meagre considering the infrastructural challenges confronting
the region, while questioning the reason why the oil-producing region
should get little compared to some other regions of the country.
He faulted the breakdown of funds appropriated for capital projects
in the six geo-political zones in the 2017 budget showing that
North-Central got N207bn; North-West, N73.7bn; South-West, N48.97bn;
North-East N46.69bn; South-South, N35.31bn; and South-East, N28.22bn.
“Members of the National Assembly, especially those from our
region, have failed us. They cannot stay on the floor of the National
Assembly to see that they are sharing something to the Niger Delta
people, the area that produces most of the nation’s resources are
missing and they cannot communicate to the people they are representing.
“They are failures. They ought to have said this is not fair to
our people and we are rejecting it. The aspect of funds for the capital
projects is insulting and they must find a way to address it, either
through the executive bill or whatever, because we can’t accept this.
How is Nigeria one nation? You will get 90 percent of the funds from the
oil-rich Niger Delta, yet you give them the least allocation for
capital projects. This is an anomaly,” he had said.
Reacting to the various agitations and grievances, Ogundeji noted
that it was for that reason that the government should find ways to
engage stakeholders in all the regions to discuss all the issues.
“Government needs to tell the people why more appointments
favour the North, what it is doing about alleged killings by suspected
Fulani herdsmen across the country and so on. These are genuine concerns
that these meetings being held by Osinbajo will not solve. People are
calling for restructuring; government should let the people know why it
appears to be against it. Is it because it might not favour some
sections of the country,” he said.
A Lagos—based lawyer, Mr. Liborous Oshoma, described fairness and
equitable distribution of wealth as integral to dousing tensions in
situations where people feel they are being marginalised.
He said, “We know we are incompatible but no matter how greatly
incompatible we are, we can coexist peacefully if we agree to agree on
certain issues and agree to disagree on others. And the way we can agree
to agree and agree to disagree is for us to come together and find out
those areas that will strengthen us and those areas that will divide and
see how we can make amends.
“People have always been talking about meetings, national
conferences and so on, but the problem is that we have never really been
sincere with them. We are on the march to getting to sit down again to
talk.
“Yes, meeting with various stakeholders is a welcome
development to douse tensions, and should have come earlier, but
unfortunately, the President’s (earlier) statements did not encourage
all that and his body language and appointment also further fuelled the
agitations. But it is better late than never. But the acting president
should not just end it with meetings.
“There is the need to allow consultations to trickle down to
the grass roots and get recommendations from those consultations to be
put into use. There should be equitable distribution of wealth. No
matter how small I am, I also want to be treated equally and fairly. If
we have a situation where everyone is equally and fairly treated, living
together in peace becomes easy. There is no way you can do that 100 per
cent, but once there is a seemingly fair treatment, it becomes easy.”
Human rights lawyer, Mr. Femi Aborisade, however, identified
poverty and poor governance as major factors contributing to the
frustrations of Nigerians and their perceived hatred for other tribes.
Aborisade noted that beyond the Presidency’s meetings with
religious and traditional leaders, the administration should work to
improve the living condition of Nigerians.
He said, “The underlying issue is that people are frustrated.
It is the harsh economic reality that is compelling people to assume
that it is the presence of other ethnic groups in their geographical
areas that is the cause of their problem, but even if Nigeria breaks up
into 1,000 independent countries, unless the problem of poverty and poor
governance is dealt with, we will just have poverty being multiplied in
the number of countries into which Nigeria may be broken.
“The government should deal with poverty and come up with
programmes and policies that will bring about the redistribution of
income. People are unemployed; those who have jobs are being sacked.
Government must deal with these issues and provide medical care, social
housing, jobs, and so on.”
No comments :
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: All the comments on this blog are the personal opinions of those who have comment it (commentators)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertise with us: E-mail: enyinnayaemma@gmail.com
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.