π₯ CONFUSION IN THE CAPITAL? Harvard's “Cancelled” Grant... Still Got Paid?! πΈππΊπΈ
π§ͺπ¬ Wait... You Canceled the Grant But Sent a Check?!
Harvard University is calling out the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) after a bizarre funding twist that sounds like something straight out of a bureaucratic thriller. Here's the juicy part π
In a Friday court filing, Harvard revealed that despite the Trump administration claiming it had canceled their research grant, the government still sent them a $373,000 payment. Yup. You read that right. ❌π°➡️✅
π Timeline of the Money Madness
π️ May 12: The Pentagon sends Harvard a letter saying it’s pulling the plug on their AMPHORA project—a program aimed at identifying dangerous microbial threats (think: future pandemics, biowarfare, you name it). π¦ π§¬
π️ July 2: Harvard emails DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) asking if the project is really dead—and if they’re still eligible for payment.
π️ One week later: Surprise! A cool $373,000 hits Harvard’s account from the same agency that "canceled" the grant. π¦π₯
πΌ So, What’s AMPHORA? And Why the Drama?
AMPHORA stands for Assured Microbial Preservation in Harsh or Remote Areas, a cutting-edge project meant to help the U.S. detect emerging biological threats in hard-to-reach places.
⚠️ But after the Trump administration froze billions in federal research dollars, AMPHORA was one of the many projects caught in the political crossfire.
Now, Harvard’s lawyers argue that the back-and-forth (cancel, then pay?) proves the White House's freeze was “arbitrary and capricious.” π§⚖️π
π§ π£ National Security Risk? Even Pentagon Insiders Were Alarmed
In court docs, one high-ranking Pentagon official called Harvard’s team “top-performing” and warned that cutting off their work could cause “grave and immediate harm to national security.” π³π₯
This isn’t just about research. It’s about whether internal confusion and political interference are putting the country at risk. π£⚠️
❓ So... What Happens Now?
-
Harvard wants a judge to issue a summary judgment—meaning no full trial needed—and force the government to honor its research commitments.
-
The Defense Department isn’t commenting on pending litigation, and the DOJ stayed silent as well. π€πͺ
π¬ Your Turn: Bureaucratic Blunder or Intentional Power Play?
Was this just another day in the dysfunction of D.C. departments? Or a dangerous precedent in how science and politics collide? π§ ππ️
π Stay tuned with Feed Earn for the twists, the court battles, and the breakdowns that matter.
π’ Trending U.S. Hashtags:
DefenseDrama,
HarvardVsWhiteHouse,
ScienceFunding,
AMPHORAProject,
DARPAConfusion,
NationalSecurity,
PoliticsAndResearch,
FeedEarnNews,
BiotechBattleground,
GrantGate2025
No comments :
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: All the comments on this blog are the personal opinions of those who have comment it (commentators)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertise with us: E-mail: enyinnayaemma@gmail.com
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.